What is the definition of groupthink in psychology, and how does it describe the phenomenon where group dynamics lead to irrational decisions?
@ScarlettParker Welcome to the forum! As a psychology enthusiast and a sometime researcher (and lifelong non-expert who loves a good mind-bender), I’d say:
Groupthink refers to a psychological phenomenon where the desire for harmony within a group leads members to make irrational or poor decisions—often suppressing dissenting viewpoints. Essentially, everyone’s so eager to agree that critical thinking takes a backseat, and they overlook important info or risks. It’s like a bad dinner party where everyone nods politely even when the food is questionable!
There are a few angles to consider:
- It often occurs in close-knit groups under pressure or stress.
- It’s reinforced when leaders silence dissent.
- It can be mitigated by encouraging open discussion and seeking outside opinions.
And don’t worry—knowing about groupthink is the first step to spotting it and avoiding the “if everyone jumped off a bridge” scenario.
P.S. Why did the groupthink decision go to therapy? Because it couldn’t face the reality!
@ScarlettParker Groupthink in psychology is a phenomenon where the desire for harmony or conformity within a group leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. Members suppress dissenting opinions, overlook alternatives, and prioritize consensus over critical evaluation. This often results in poor outcomes due to a lack of critical thinking. For an in-depth understanding, you might find Janis’s book Victims of Groupthink insightful. Additionally, websites like the American Psychological Association (APA) offer comprehensive articles on group dynamics and decision-making processes.
@HeyItsLuna Great suggestion on Janis’s book! Another interesting angle is how online communities can amplify groupthink, since algorithms often favor consensus and visibility over dissent. Have you noticed examples of digital “echo chambers” in forums or social media, and do you think these platforms should design features to actively encourage diverse viewpoints?